|
|
Avicenna Journal of Dental Research، جلد ۵، شماره ۱، صفحات ۰-۰
|
|
|
| عنوان فارسی |
Efficacy of the Gow-Gates and Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block Techniques in Providing Anesthesia During Surgical Removal of Impacted Lower Third Molar: A Controlled Randomized Clinical Trial |
|
| چکیده فارسی مقاله |
Background In spite of common usage of the inferior alveolar nerve block (IANB), this method has some well-defined restrictions. Objectives The purpose of the present study was to compare these two techniques for the surgical removal of impacted lower third molars. Patients and Methods A total of 44 similarly impacted lower third molars (22 patients with two similar teeth) were selected. In each patient, one side was anesthetized with the Gow-Gates technique and another side with the IANB, randomly. The number of injections for achieving anesthesia, incidence of pain during injections, and the supplementary injections during surgery were recorded for each side Results In Gow-Gates technique, less repetition of injection was required to achieve anesthesia as well as less supplementary injections during surgery; however, these differences were not significant statistically (P = 0.39, P = 0.11). The pain during Gow-Gates injections was significantly shorter than that of the IANB (P = 0.007). Conclusions Even though the patients felt less pain during the Gow-Gates injection, this technique has no advantage over the IANB during surgical removal of impacted lower third molar. |
|
| کلیدواژه‌های فارسی مقاله |
|
|
| عنوان انگلیسی |
Efficacy of the Gow-Gates and Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block Techniques in Providing Anesthesia During Surgical Removal of Impacted Lower Third Molar: A Controlled Randomized Clinical Trial |
|
| چکیده انگلیسی مقاله |
Background In spite of common usage of the inferior alveolar nerve block (IANB), this method has some well-defined restrictions. Objectives The purpose of the present study was to compare these two techniques for the surgical removal of impacted lower third molars. Patients and Methods A total of 44 similarly impacted lower third molars (22 patients with two similar teeth) were selected. In each patient, one side was anesthetized with the Gow-Gates technique and another side with the IANB, randomly. The number of injections for achieving anesthesia, incidence of pain during injections, and the supplementary injections during surgery were recorded for each side Results In Gow-Gates technique, less repetition of injection was required to achieve anesthesia as well as less supplementary injections during surgery; however, these differences were not significant statistically (P = 0.39, P = 0.11). The pain during Gow-Gates injections was significantly shorter than that of the IANB (P = 0.007). Conclusions Even though the patients felt less pain during the Gow-Gates injection, this technique has no advantage over the IANB during surgical removal of impacted lower third molar. |
|
| کلیدواژه‌های انگلیسی مقاله |
|
|
| نویسندگان مقاله |
محمدرضا جمالپور | mohammad reza jamalpour
department of oral and maxillofacial surgery, hamadan university of medical sciences, hamadan, ir; department of oral and maxillofacial surgery, school of dentistry, hamadan university of medical sciences, shahid fahmide blvd., hamadan, ir iran. tel 98-9185915457, fax 98-8138350126
سازمان اصلی تایید شده: دانشگاه علوم پزشکی همدان (Hamadan university of medical sciences)
ide طلیم خانی | ide talimkhani
general dental practitioner, hamadan, ir iran
|
|
| نشانی اینترنتی |
http://www.avicennajdr.com/index.php?page=article&article_id=20938 |
| فایل مقاله |
فایلی برای مقاله ذخیره نشده است |
| کد مقاله (doi) |
10.17795/ajdr-20938 |
| زبان مقاله منتشر شده |
fa |
| موضوعات مقاله منتشر شده |
|
| نوع مقاله منتشر شده |
1 |
|
|
|
برگشت به:
صفحه اول پایگاه |
نسخه مرتبط |
نشریه مرتبط |
فهرست نشریات
|